🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a new playlist titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this mode mirrors the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several notable changes:

• Each team includes just 8 real players, with the remaining made up of AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions done by real players award full XP, while AI activities offer reduced XP.
• Just a pair of locations are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking are disabled.

In short, the playlist lives up to its name: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, as it gives more options for players seeking different methods to have fun with the title. But, if video games has shown one thing, it's that you can't please everyone. In other words, many Battlefield 6 fans are mad.

Community Responses: From Fury to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the mistakes of your competitors," reads a response to the official announcement. "Truly disappointing concept," comments a different user. Meanwhile, in community forums, a player remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," while someone else details everything they consider to be broken in the game: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, adjust aiming after sprinting, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players explaining how much they're enjoying the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, real players keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and can't play this title all the time. Let them strike a balance," states a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is great for me," and another praises the mode for "not being overcompetitive."

Constructive Criticisms and Player Feedback

Despite the support, there are constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. A few folks have highlighted that it will make wait times even longer for other modes because of the sheer number of options in the game already. Similarly, some areas already encounter AI-filled matches in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of real players, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to provide complete rewards, even against bots, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the mode. Thus Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base meeting them halfway, according to forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to change it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Occur?

Should Battlefield Studios has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and responding to player input. Assignments being too difficult were adjusted rapidly, as did the required Redsec challenges. Chances are that, should analytics shows this recent mode is underperforming to their standards, they will not hesitate to make further modifications.