🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore opportunities?

If not, the reason might be your gender.

The Test: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment recently following popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - adding results-driven business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Questions Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported extraordinary results.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline substantially.

The Process

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and insightful, but also warm and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Each day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all participants encountered favorable results. One writer who changed both her profile gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to understand how it functions in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and unpredictable."